ARTICLE TEMPLATE
ISSN
VISITOR
About the Journal
| Editor in Chief: | Khairil Fazal, S.Th.I., M.Ag |
| Publisher: | Lembaga Kajian Sosial Politik Aceh (LaKaspia) |
| Frequency: | 2 issues per year |
Muqaranah Al-Adyan is a peer-reviewed academic journal publishing scholarly works in religious studies from diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives. It accepts original articles based on both textual analysis and empirical research.
The journal particularly emphasizes studies exploring the dynamics of religion in Indonesia and Southeast Asia, focusing on religion's relationship with culture, society, history, and doctrinal developments. It aims to enrich global academic discourse by fostering regional perspectives and innovative approaches to the study of religion.
Current Issue
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): May
Published:
2026-05-18
Articles
-
Refuting the Narrative of Intolerance: A Historical and Empirical Analysis of Religious Harmony in Aceh
39 Abstract Views 45 PDF/File DownloadsView Abstract
This study aims to refute the prevailing narrative of intolerance in Aceh by presenting a comprehensive historical and empirical analysis of religious harmony in the region. Aceh, widely known as the “Veranda of Mecca,” has often been portrayed in national and international discourse as an area with low levels of religious tolerance, particularly due to its implementation of Islamic law. However, this perception frequently overlooks the broader socio-historical and cultural context of Acehnese society. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach that integrates historical, sociological, and literature-based methods, this research examines patterns of interreligious relations from the era of the Samudra Pasai Sultanate to contemporary Aceh. The findings reveal that values of tolerance, openness, and coexistence have long been embedded in Acehnese society, reflected in historical records of cross-cultural trade, the acceptance of foreign leaders, and the preservation of non-Muslim religious sites. Empirical evidence further demonstrates that interfaith harmony continues to be practiced in everyday life, supported by local wisdom such as peumulia jamee (honoring guests) and communal solidarity traditions. Case studies from various regions in Aceh, along with testimonies from community leaders and minority groups, indicate a high level of social cohesion and mutual respect among religious communities. This study argues that the narrative of intolerance in Aceh is largely shaped by external perspectives that tend to generalize isolated incidents without considering the region’s complex social realities. By integrating historical insights and contemporary empirical data, this research offers a more balanced understanding of Aceh as a society where Islamic values coexist with pluralism and universal human principles
-
A Multidisciplinary Comparative Analysis of the Story of Prophet Noah in the Qur’an and the Bible
36 Abstract Views 14 PDF/File DownloadsView Abstract
This study examines the story of Prophet Noah in the Qur’an and the Bible through a multidisciplinary comparative approach encompassing theological, historical, literary, and socio-religious perspectives. The aim of this research is to identify the similarities and differences in narrative structure, theological emphasis, and moral messages conveyed by both sacred texts, as well as to understand their implications for religious understanding among believers. The method employed is a qualitative library research approach with a comparative narrative analysis, utilizing primary sources from the Qur’an and the Bible alongside relevant secondary literature. The findings reveal that the Qur’an presents the story of Prophet Noah thematically, emphasizing the dimensions of prophetic preaching (da‘wah), steadfast faith, and the rejection of truth by his people. In contrast, the Bible offers a more chronological narrative, focusing on God’s covenant, the salvation of Noah’s family, and the manifestation of divine law. From a literary perspective, the Qur’an employs a concise and symbolic rhetorical style, whereas the Bible provides a more descriptive and historical account. Theologically, both texts affirm the oneness and justice of God, yet differ in their emphasis on the mechanisms of salvation and the nature of the relationship between God and humanity. In conclusion, despite differences in narrative approach and theological focus, both traditions convey shared universal values such as faith, obedience, patience, and moral lessons derived from past communities. This multidisciplinary approach enriches interreligious understanding and opens pathways for more inclusive dialogue within comparative religious studies
