A Multidisciplinary Comparative Analysis of the Story of Prophet Noah in the Qur’an and the Bible
Abstract
This study examines the story of Prophet Noah in the Qur’an and the Bible through a multidisciplinary comparative approach encompassing theological, historical, literary, and socio-religious perspectives. The aim of this research is to identify the similarities and differences in narrative structure, theological emphasis, and moral messages conveyed by both sacred texts, as well as to understand their implications for religious understanding among believers. The method employed is a qualitative library research approach with a comparative narrative analysis, utilizing primary sources from the Qur’an and the Bible alongside relevant secondary literature. The findings reveal that the Qur’an presents the story of Prophet Noah thematically, emphasizing the dimensions of prophetic preaching (da‘wah), steadfast faith, and the rejection of truth by his people. In contrast, the Bible offers a more chronological narrative, focusing on God’s covenant, the salvation of Noah’s family, and the manifestation of divine law. From a literary perspective, the Qur’an employs a concise and symbolic rhetorical style, whereas the Bible provides a more descriptive and historical account. Theologically, both texts affirm the oneness and justice of God, yet differ in their emphasis on the mechanisms of salvation and the nature of the relationship between God and humanity. In conclusion, despite differences in narrative approach and theological focus, both traditions convey shared universal values such as faith, obedience, patience, and moral lessons derived from past communities. This multidisciplinary approach enriches interreligious understanding and opens pathways for more inclusive dialogue within comparative religious studies
Keywords
Prophet NoahQur’anBibleComparative AnalysisMultidisciplinaryReferences
Abdullah Saeed. (2014). Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First Century A Contextualist Approach. Routledge.
Ahmad. (2018). Bencana dalam Konteks Spiritualitas Islam. Syaikhuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pranata Islam, 9(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.36835/syaikhuna.v9i2.3262
Angelika Neuwirth. (2019). The Qur’an and Late Antiquity A Shared Heritage. Oxford University Press.
Apaydin, H. I. (2026). Prophetic Moral Exemplarity in the Qur’an: A Functional Reading of the Doctrine of ʿIṣmah. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6141149
Brannon M. Wheeler. (2002). Moses in the Quran and Islamic Exegesis. Routledge/Curzon.
Catherine Cornille. (2008). The Im-Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue. Crossroad Publishing Company.
Danandjaja, J. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Antropologi Indonesia, 52. https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i52.3318
Fazlur Rahman. (2009). Major Themes of the Qur’an. University of Chicago Press.
Ferreira, H., & Sutton, L. (2024). Ecological hermeneutics as a current trend in old testament research in the book of psalms. Acta Theologica, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v44i1.8309
G. K. Beale. (2004). The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God. InterVarsity Press.
Gabriel Said Reynolds. (2018). The Qur’an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. Yale University Press.
Gordon J. Wenham. (1987). Genesis 1–15. Word Books.
Hurnawijaya, Auladi, A., Fitriana, N., Khaqiqi, A. F., Mutiara, M., Ningrum, U., Nadila, T., Haikal, M. A., Alfi, S. U. N., Nurilhilmah, & Arsyad, N. (2025). Dialectical engagement with biblical narratives in Ibn ‘Ashur’s Tafsīr Al-Taḥrīr wa Al-Tanwīr: Study of Aaron, Jesus, and Noah’s Wife narratives. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/84c1wd64
Istiqomah, S. (2022). PENDIDIKAN ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF KISAH PARA NABI. Hadlonah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengasuhan Anak, 3(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.47453/hadlonah.v3i1.664
John Goldingay. (2003). Old Testament Theology: Israel’s Gospel. InterVarsity Press.
John H. Walton. (2018). Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. Baker Academic.
Kenneth I. Pargament. (2001). The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. Guilford Press.
M. A. S. Abdel Haleem. (2008). The Qur’an Oxford World’s Classics. OUP Oxford.
Moh. Nazir. (1999). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Muhammad Abdel Haleem. (2010). Understanding the Qur’an: Themes and Style. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid. (2002). Tekstualitas Al-Qur’an ; Kritik terhadap Ulumul Qur’an. LKis.
Nengsih, D. (2020). PROFIL PEREMPUAN DURHAKA DAN SALIHAH DALAM Q.S. AL-TAHRIM [66]: 10-12. QOF, 4(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v4i2.2087
Nur, S. (2017). Etos Profesionalisme Kerja Para Nabi dalam Al Quran. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 10(1).
Nurshabrina, Q. (2021). Dakwah Nabi Nuh ‘Alaihissalam: Studi Tafsir Tematik Dakwah Nabi Nuh dalam Surat Nuh. Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.58404/uq.v1i1.9
Salsabila, N., Mohamad, A., Ahmad, A. S., & Mustaqimah. (2024). Kisah Nabi Nuh Dalam Al- Qur ’ an. Al-Qorni: Jurnlal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 09(02).
Sidjabat, B. S. (2025). Christian Leadership in the Church, Education, and the Public Sphere: Reviewed from the Urgency of Character Renewal. Didache: Journal of Christian Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46445/djce.v6i2.1082
Spoelstra, J. J. (2023). Noah’s Ark and the Flood in Judaism and Islam: A Bi-optic Perspective of Salvation and Sacred Space. Scriptura, 122(1). https://doi.org/10.7833/122-1-2067
Stulman, L. J. (2008). Jeremiah as a Messenger of Hope in Crisis. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology, 62(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002096430806200102
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumual, A. R., Sualang, F. Y., & Pattinama, D. (2022). Makna Kata שָׁפַך (Shapak) Berdasarkan Kitab Kejadian 9:6. HUPERETES: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen, 3(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.46817/huperetes.v3i1.81
The Cosmic Ecology of Violence. (2020). In Portraying Violence in the Hebrew Bible (pp. 52–69). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108637558.004
Wakhidah, N. (2025). Jasser Auda’s Multidimensional System (Ta’addud Al-Ab’ad) in Reconciling Contradictory Arguments. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(6).
Copyright & License
© 2026 Ning Ratna Sinta Dewi, Siti Wahdaniah Nur Annisa, Rabiatul Adawiyah, Grandis Rangga Putra, Muhammad Rauf Amrullah, Andryan Kurnia Pratama, Muhammad Rizki Saputra, Faiz Laksmana Saragih (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
